Hello Gamma Team,

I really enjoy using Gamma, but I’d like to suggest a more flexible subscription model that better fits users like me who don’t use the platform every day.

Currently, the subscription runs on a continuous calendar basis — meaning days are counted even when I don’t use Gamma. However, I only need the platform occasionally (maybe for a few weeks or a month throughout the whole year).

It would be great if you could introduce an , where a day is only counted when I actually use Gamma (even for a few minutes). Additionally, a would allow users to pause their subscription during inactive periods, so no days are deducted when the account is frozen.

This approach would make Gamma more affordable and fair for light or seasonal users, and would likely increase long-term retention.

Thank you for considering this feature, I believe it would make a big difference for many of us.

Best regards,

Shareef Amawi

Good afternoon, dear Gamma company. I am very pleased with the new neural network and would like to thank you for such a useful program. Before I start sharing my ideas, I would like to wish you good luck in everything and in the development of the Gamma program.

So, the topic is about Credits (coins).

I would like to suggest the following: I have a lot of presentations on my page that I made without knowing about the existence of coins, and I need them now.

My advice is to exchange the presentations I have already made for coins. I think this is a great idea for both beginners and experienced users.

For example, if I spend 40 coins on a presentation, I can exchange it for 20 coins after 10 days. But I won't be able to exchange my presentations for 10 days.

Let pro user use premium AI images model, its OK to charge credits from us, but let us use it.

I’m a PhD student from Ukraine and recently tried Gamma Pro with the 30% student discount. The product is excellent, but the $25/month price is high for many users in price-sensitive regions, including me.

More importantly, my usage pattern doesn’t justify a full month: I don’t create presentations every day, or even every week (unlike ChatGPT, which I use daily for many tasks). Mostly, I need Gamma for only 2–4 focused days per month. I use Gamma mainly to create the initial structure of my presentation that is based on my slide plan, then refine it in PowerPoint because I have my own habits.

Because of the monthly model, I sometimes feel pressure to use the service just to “get my money’s worth,” even when I don’t actually need it. That’s not ideal for me as a PhD student, and it likely discourages many occasional users from upgrading at all.

Suggestion: Please consider a 24-hour Gamma Pro pass, priced around $2–$4. A small, time-boxed purchase is much more affordable than $25/month and is often sufficient to complete a project or meet a deadline. Many users—myself included—would likely purchase it for three days per month as needed.

Ce n'est pas intéressant d'un point de vue utilisateur de passer de payer 25 $ pour générer 60 cartes, puis devoir ajouter 75 $ — soit 100 $ au total — pour obtenir seulement 15 cartes supplémentaires est peu convaincant. Il serait plus raisonnable d'offrir soit un palier supérieur avec beaucoup plus de cartes (par exemple 100 cartes), soit de réduire l'abonnement à un niveau proche de 60 $ pour refléter l'écart réel de valeur. En l'état, l'augmentation paraît disproportionnée.

Como um usuário assíduo do gama, eu já utilizo dele a anos, e sempre fui fiel, porém, adoraria compreender como é o ultra, não acjo interessante eu ter de pagar o equivalente a $100 ou R$550 para ter acesso a essa parte da ferramenta sem nem saber as verdadeiras capacidades desse nível. Acho interessante a ideia de vocês, mas se desejam tanto o crescimento, repenssem a estratégia de preços para diferentes países, pois para o público brasileiro R$550 em uma ferramenta que nem tem muita diferença da versão pro para a versão ultra, fica quase que inviável. A gamma pode ter mercado internacional para o preço solicitado, mas no brasil não. E se vocês não tomarem cuidado com essa precificação outras ferramentas ultrapassam vocês por muito menos.. Repenssem essa estratégia para o brasil. Até R$250,00 ainda faz sentido, mais que isso, simplesmente compensa as ferramentas nacionais...

I've been one of Gamma's biggest fans for the past year. I subscribed to Pro, volunteered for the Gambassador program, and spent time with the team in a 1-on-1 interview because I believe in the product. That's why the recent changes to the Pro plan are so disheartening.

Two recent decisions feel like a major step backward:

Paywalling Existing Features: The best image models, once a staple of the Pro plan, are now locked behind a new, more expensive "Ultra" tier. For those of us on an annual plan, this feels like a feature we paid for is being taken away. Introducing a credit system but then making some credits more valuable than others by walling off certain credit-demanding features just feels stingy. Why not give users the freedom to spend their credits as they see fit across all tiers?

Downgrading Plan Limits: The card generation limit was silently reduced from 60 to 50 for pro users. Presumably this was done to increase the appeal of the ultra-expensive Ultra subscription, but this is a clear downgrade to a core feature that was promised at the time of purchase.

It feels like the terms of my annual subscription were changed unilaterally, which I consider a breach of trust.

I work in academia and have been a passionate evangelist for Gamma, touting its benefits to many of my colleagues. But I can't recommend a product that changes its promises to paid users mid-subscription. I hope that Gamma will listen to its community and find a solution that honors the commitment of its early supporters.

The new agent feature is a strict downgrade from the app I already purchased and paid for. When I paid for my subscription, I was capable of unlimited editing cards via text. Now I cannot. Please don't take away features that have already been paid for.