I am a Clinical Marketing Manager in Medical Devices . I have paid for the Gamma annual subscription to improve my efficiency, precision & speed I require professional ppts for sharing with Drs which means minimalist clutter with white background on my Company template. The issues that i am facing are 1) When making the gamma i would want calibri & or Aptos as my default fonts with header 40 & Body fonts 16 to 20 (on my template) depending on content 2)I require Office Theme as in Windows 11 MS office with header & body (One Box with bulleted points which can be edited with one selection of the box & not line by line) 3)This is mandated by the company. Now the issues i face in Gamma & the exporting to ppt 1) The prompts given to Gamma on ideation, creation, research & final presentation in Gamma are in-depth & precise when source documents are provided otherwise it churns out outdated information 2) Calibri & Aptos fonts are not available. Normally it uses Raleway i think which is not very friendly when converting3)The presentation when in Gamma form looks quite well spaced throughout the cards after adjusting the font sizes which you expect what your final exported ppt will look like 4)When you export the Gamma to ppt all hell breaks loose & what you get is nowhere near the presentation that you expected. The observations: 1) The ppt slides are not spaced evenly from left to right or top to bottom. they are either shrunk or overflowing. You can't recognize this was the presentation that Gamma made 2) The contents are in a line & if you have to edit anything you have to do the back breaking job of selecting each box & editing which virtually blinds you since it so strenuous 3)You have to edit each & every box manually & you wonder why i used Gamma in the first place. I could have used Claude or Co Pilot to get better presentations. Now since i have paid my annual subscription i am stuck with this. I seek your active intervention to rectify these issues. In your feedback section there are 307 people who have expressed dissatisfaction only in EXPORTING Gamma to PPT & there is no solution from your end so far. Hope that you address this problem on a war footing basis if you would not like to lose your customers. Looking forward to your response ASAP Regards Parminder

schriftarten bei der erstellung bereits in gamma zu ändern in standards habe ich noch nicht probiert ggf. geht das oder der KI kann ich es sagen? ich spiele damit noch rum, wollte mich aber mit so einem mist eigentlich nicht mehr beschäftigen.

LG Andreas

Sempre quando exporto para o power point tenho problema com alguns slides que mudam de tamanho a letra e imagens, a fonte sempre dá algum problema, gostaria de escolher a fonte e manter o tamanho original

Hi Gamma team,

I’m experiencing a problem when exporting presentations to PowerPoint (.pptx). In the Gamma interface, I set a font to Arial with Bold weight. However, in the generated PPTX, the font is written in the XML as a separate typeface "Arial Bold" instead of using the standard Arial typeface with a b="1" attribute for bold.

Current (incorrect) XML snippet from slide*.xml:

xml

<a:rPr>

<a:latin typeface="Arial Bold" pitchFamily="34" charset="0"/>

</a:rPr>

Expected (correct) format according to Office Open XML specification:

xml

<a:rPr b="1">

<a:latin typeface="Arial" pitchFamily="34" charset="0"/>

</a:rPr>

The current output causes font substitution issues when the presentation is opened in PowerPoint on systems where "Arial Bold" is not registered as a separate font (which is the default on Windows and macOS). The correct approach uses the family name "Arial" and the bold property b="1" to apply the bold style.

This affects any font where a bold variant is requested. Please update the PPTX exporter to follow the standard OOXML structure.

Thank you for your attention to this issue. Let me know if you need any additional details or test files.

Best regards,

Igor

PPT is the way presentations happen. it is how they are shared. it is how most companies create and use them. It allows you to have the files on your local system so you can edit and present them without network access.

You ppt export is a no go. And asking someone to use a gamma link is also okay in some instances but not going to work at the schools i create content for. and if I am just going to end up doing a crapload of editing on what you create I might as well just stick with Claude since it can do a bunch of other things as well.