Problem: When multiple people collaborate on a Gamma doc, it’s hard to see what actually changed from one version to the next. Version history shows that something changed, but not what changed, where, or by whom. This makes reviews slow and forces teams to manually compare versions or rely on side conversations to understand edits. Why this matters: In collaborative workflows, especially for client-facing or high-stakes content, clarity and accountability are critical. Without tracked changes: *Reviewers can’t quickly validate edits *Feedback loops slow down *Mistakes or unintended changes slip through *Teams duplicate effort trying to explain or re-review work Proposed solution: Add a tracked changes / suggestion mode similar to Microsoft Word or Google Docs, where: *Insertions, deletions, and edits are visually highlighted *Changes are attributed to specific collaborators *Reviewers can accept or reject changes individually *There’s an option to toggle tracked changes on/off Impact This would significantly improve collaborative editing by: *Making reviews faster and more precise *Increasing confidence in version-to-version changes *Reducing coordination overhead and side-channel communication *Making Gamma more viable for team-based, professional, and client-facing work Tracked changes would be a major usability upgrade for teams that rely on Gamma as a shared workspace, not just a solo creation tool.
